As is customary in the mobile market, lots of focus has been given to specific products over the last couple of months. Literally hundreds of discussions can be found online, both positive and negative, around the iPhone 4S, iOS 5, or the Kindle Fire for instance. Many people in the US seem to exhibit an almost cult-like following of various electronic brands, and that elicits even more writing and speculation online. Factor in the huge battle going on between the Android and iOS ecosystems for dominance in the mobile market, and you can see why there is so much written about who is going to win, and who isn’t.

After all, a study by Markets and Markets estimates the worldwide mobile app market alone at $25 billion by 2015. That doesn’t take into account worldwide revenue generated by mobile devices, mobile wireless services, mobile accessories, mobile consulting, and so on. The market is already huge and growing rapidly. There is a lot at stake.

Any given week a reader can find dozens of metrics generated by various companies who watch the mobile market on an ongoing basis. All of us who write for The Mobilists will quote one or more of these statistics in just about every post. There’s so much data out there it’s easy to miss the forest for the trees. So I thought it would be worthwhile to look beyond all the numbers to see what the statistics are really telling us. For those of us who are deploying mobile apps or other mobile technologies, I think it is worthwhile for us to see the big picture of what the mobile trends are telling us. In most cases that message is actually quite easy to understand. For this post I’ll focus my comments on the US market, though in many ways it is similar to the worldwide market.

Smartphones

According to a report released by ComScore in October, Android is now found on 43.7% of all smartphones in the US. That is over a 5 percentage point increase since the last quarter. According to numbers from Canalys, Android has an even bigger domination worldwide with almost 50% of the worldwide smartphone market. iOS is now on 27.3% of smartphones in the US, up almost a percentage point from the second quarter of this year. And remember with Apple many people were holding off to purchase what they thought was the iPhone 5, so I imagine these numbers were somewhat depressed for iOS. Factor in a new carrier (Sprint) being added to the Apple fold along with a new device (iPhone 4S), and I would expect Apple to make bigger gains in the fourth quarter.

So what do these numbers mean? First of all they confirm the domination of Android and iPhone in the US market. 71% of all smartphones in the US are one or the other…and that market share is growing rapidly. Some numbers I have seen project Android will own 50% of the US market by the end of this year. From what I’m reading, most industry watchers expect Apple to get a big boost from the iPhone 4S, especially over the holiday season when so many are purchased as gifts. So this domination by the top two operating systems should continue to grow for the foreseeable future.

What doesn’t get mentioned nearly as much is the fact some big players are really losing out. For instance, RIM, the makers of BlackBerry, have continued their precipitous fall from grace that began about three years ago. Depending on the study you look at, market share for RIM in the US is anywhere between 9% and 19.7%. No matter what numbers you accept, the trend for RIM is unmistakable. They are losing market share at the rate of 4-5 percentage points each quarter. That’s amazing for a company who was the market leader with about 45% market share just 4 years ago. Couple that with the fact the Palm has disappeared in that same time frame and you can see how quickly the mobile market can change.

So what do these market share percentages and trends mean for us? Well, if you are a mobile developer and haven’t already done it, you should be getting acquainted with both iPhone and Android. While it was OK in the personal computer world to develop just for Mac or just for Windows, in the mobile world users expect apps to be available on both. Fortunately there are some nice cross platform tools that make supporting both platforms much easier than developing twice from scratch. These tools aren’t magic, but they do make the job of supporting applications in two environments easier in most cases. Of course I think you should always consider your target market when developing an app, so in select cases the RIM platform will still be the target, but that won’t be the case much longer, at least in the US.

What if you are an IT department? If it were me, I would be assembling tools and building policies for how I was going to support iPhone and Android. Many IT departments in larger companies are already supporting a large BlackBerry population, but again I don’t think that will last for much longer. If it were me I would be readying myself to support iPhone and Android. Microsoft might be able to step up and make an impact on the market, but the way it is looking I am highly doubtful that will happen. So unless something very unexpected happens, iOS and Android it is unless specific business issues dictate otherwise.

Tablets

The tablet market is must less chaotic than the smartphone market…at least for now. Apple has complete control of the tablet market with an estimated 80% market share in the US according to one report. I’ve seen numbers for worldwide market share that don’t look much different. That leaves the other 20% for Android and everything else (Playbook for instance). Most industry watchers agree the overwhelming majority of that 20% is made up of Android tablets. To be quite honest, I’m surprised Android is doing even that well with market share. Most of the Android tablets to date have been clunky and expensive. It’s hard to compete with that recipe when Apple does such a good job with user experience. The iPad is very, very good. But Apple is not invincible. RIM, Palm, IBM, Microsoft and other once-dominant technology companies have all learned this lesson the hard way.

Amazon’s new Kindle Fire promises to bring some characteristics to the table other Android tablets simply haven’t had. For instance, Amazon has a pre-built, extremely loyal, user base of people using their wildly popular existing Kindle readers. My wife and my father are both loyal Kindle users, and both are individuals I think would benefit from the Fire. It’s similar in form factor to what they are accustomed to with the Kindle, and it gives them access to games, movies, music, social media, etc…all things they cannot access with their Kindle. And why buy an iPad for  $300 more than it costs to buy a Fire. It’s dramatically cheaper, it’s familiar, and it’s a brand they have grown to trust and love. Sound familiar? Except for the cheap part it’s a list of qualities that helps keep Apple on top.

This argument doesn’t necessarily hold for non-Kindle users, but there are enough Kindle users that I think the Fire will be a huge success. Estimates have put expected fourth quarter Fire sales somewhere in the range of 3-5 million devices. If Amazon is able to achieve this level of adoption (and I think it is very likely), they will give Apple a worthy competitor. While 3-5 million is a far cry from the number of iPads Apple will sell this year, I think it is an admirable start, and a much bigger impact on the market than any tablet other than iPad has even come close to. And if industry rumors and reports are any indication, Amazon appears to be building a pipeline of tablets with additional form factors.

Now don’t get me wrong. I do not see the Kindle Fire as a business tablet. And that means when you look at everything else out there, the best alternative today is the tablet with the largest market share…the iPad. But what many people do not realize is that building some business apps on iPad can be problematic, especially for larger companies. Most companies want to push and retrieve data to and from apps on mobile devices. It’s one of the things that makes business apps quite different from most consumer apps. iOS makes some of this unattended data transfer difficult. I was in a meeting last week with about half a dozen CIOs, and 3 of them cited data synchronization issues as the primary reason they have not deployed iPad tablets on a more widespread basis. Some of them have even resorted to developing for Windows based tablets…gasp!

There are some workaround for this…there are always workarounds, but it does make things difficult. I don’t see the Kindle Fire as a big business platform, but what I do think the Fire will do is open the market up more fully for Android tablets. A friend of mine who develops games for iOS is even porting one of his games to the Fire. To me that demonstrates how even big Apple fans can see the potential for the Fire specifically. But regardless of how Kindle Fire will do in the future, if I were deploying a business app for a tablet, I would be focused just about exclusively on the iPad for now. A year from now I think the market will likely be different, but for now there is not a device that comes close in terms of its usability.

Wrap Up

So what does all of this mean? Again, it once again shows just how dominate iOS and Android are in the US market. It’s easy to dismiss Android if you carry an Apple device, and vice versa, but in reality together they form an environment that will continue to play off each other and drive better mobile products for all of us. Even Apple’s iOS 5 announcement addressed some of the things Android had which iOS was lacking, and in some cases in a more elegant way. This competitive push is good for the market, but it’s not good for companies like RIM and Microsoft who seem to continue to struggle with their approach and execution.

 

Tagged with:
 

4 Responses to US Smartphone and Tablet Market Share

  1. Rashedul C. says:

    I think the introduction of Windows 8 in 2012 will completely change the tablet landscape. If an enterprise runs on Windows, it makes sense to invest in Windows apps not iOS or Android. PC vendors like HP and Dell are already planning Windows 8-based tablet PCs for enterprise. Here is a Windows 8 Enterprise Research from Information Week
    http://www.informationweek.com/news/galleries/windows/operatingsystems/231901972

  2. Mike Ishmael says:

    Rashedul, you make a valid point in regards to bringing up Windows 8. However, I do not personally think it is a given that IT organizations will definitely adopt Windows 8 based tablets. I have been around large IT organizations for several years, as I am sure you have, and they support environments today hardly anyone envisioned 20 years ago.

    At one point in time nobody would have dreamed Windows would be the key operating system running many corporate systems, and they certainly did not think Linux would be the hit it has become. I remember the discussions in several Fortune 100 companies about not moving to Linux because it was open source and they couldn’t imagine not having a corporation responsible for developing and supporting the OS. I think this history certainly leaves the door open for iOS and Android.

    I would also have to say that even if large enterprises move to Windows 8 for the desktop does not mean they will move to it from a tablet perspective. A lot will likely happen before a tablet version of Windows 8 comes to market. The current evolution of tablets as defined by the original iPad did not even exist until 18 months ago. Things change very rapidly in the mobile market, and what corporations do with mobility is being driven like never before based on consumer adoption.

    We’ll have to wait to see what actually happens with Windows 8, but I am skeptical. Regardless, you make a great point and you have some research to back up your viewpoint. That makes for a lively discussion. Thanks for chiming in on the blog.

  3. Hi Mike,

    I had not seen previous references to data synchronization issues with the iPad. Is this purely related to apps, or does it apply to other areas?

    Carolyn

    • Mike Ishmael says:

      Carolyn,
      I don’t want to make a huge deal out of the data synchronization issue as I think it tends to apply more to larger organizations. It is specifically related to apps. This is the deal. If a company wants to build a database on the iPad and store data there so it can function offline, they can write an app to do that. For instance, the app might connect at 2am and transfer or synchronize data so they iPad has the most up-to-date information. There are lots of reasons large companies might want to do this.

      The problem in the iOS world is the user has to “accept” that action. We’ve all seen the little windows pop up notifying us of various events on our iPads. In the discussion I was in, at least 2 of the CIOs see this as a problem. They can’t just update the data in the middle of the night. The user must acknowledge it before it takes place. In other environments such as Windows, using something such as merge replication this can be done without any user intervention making sure the device always has the most recent data.

      Again, I don’t want to make a huge deal out of this, but some companies see this as an issue. It kept two different organizations I was in the meeting with from deploying several dozen to several hundred iPads…at least for the time being.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>